CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung L100
vs Samsung SDC-MS61

Archive illustration for Samsung L100

Samsung / 2008

L100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung SDC-MS61

Samsung / 2006

SDC-MS61

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
L100
25 mm²
SDC-MS61
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The L100 and SDC-MS61 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

L100MetricSDC-MS61
8.2 MPEffective pixels6 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.74 µmPixel pitch2.03 µm
3.03 µm²Pixel area4.14 µm²
33.01 MP/cm²Pixel density24.15 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
154 gWeight—
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorage—
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The L100 and SDC-MS61 have the same sensor area. The SDC-MS61 has the lighter body. The L100 has the higher effective resolution. The L100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose L100

Released in 2008, L100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SDC-MS61

Released in 2006, SDC-MS61 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras