CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung HZ30W
vs Samsung ST90

Archive illustration for Samsung HZ30W

Samsung / 2010

HZ30W

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST90

Samsung / 2011

ST90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
HZ30W
28 mm²
ST90
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The HZ30W and ST90 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

HZ30WMetricST90
12 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.02 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.54 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight121 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion SLB-11A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The HZ30W and ST90 have the same sensor area. The ST90 has the lighter body. The ST90 has the higher effective resolution. The ST90 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose HZ30W

Released in 2010, HZ30W has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST90

Released in 2011, ST90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras