Reasons to choose Galaxy Camera 2
Released in 2014, Galaxy Camera 2 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 283 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
vs Samsung WB35F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Galaxy Camera 228 mm²
WB35F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Galaxy Camera 2 and WB35F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Galaxy Camera 2MetricWB35F
16.3 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.32 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.75 µm²Pixel area1.76 µm²
57.27 MP/cm²Pixel density56.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,280 × 720
283 gWeight195 g
micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXCStoragemicroSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Li-on 2000mAhBatteryBP70A
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Galaxy Camera 2 and WB35F have the same sensor area. The WB35F has the lighter body. The Galaxy Camera 2 has the higher effective resolution. The Galaxy Camera 2 and WB35F were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB35F
Released in 2014, WB35F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.