CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung EX2F
vs Samsung ST66

Archive illustration for Samsung EX2F

Samsung / 2012

EX2F

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST66

Samsung / 2012

ST66

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
EX2F
28 mm²
ST66
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The EX2F has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EX2FMetricST66
12.4 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.85 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
3.42 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
29.2 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
294 gWeight101 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStoragemicroSD/microSDHC
Lithium-Ion SLB-10A battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EX2F has the larger sensor area. The ST66 has the lighter body. The ST66 has the higher effective resolution. The EX2F and ST66 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EX2F

Released in 2012, EX2F has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 294 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST66

Released in 2012, ST66 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 101 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras