CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung EX1
vs Samsung ST96

Archive illustration for Samsung EX1

Samsung / 2010

EX1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST96

Samsung / 2011

ST96

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
EX1
28 mm²
ST96
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The EX1 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EX1MetricST96
10 MPEffective pixels14.6 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.16 × 4.62
2.06 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
4.25 µm²Pixel area1.95 µm²
23.55 MP/cm²Pixel density51.3 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
386 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion SLB-07A battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EX1 has the larger sensor area. The ST96 has the lighter body. The ST96 has the higher effective resolution. The ST96 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EX1

Released in 2010, EX1 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 386 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST96

Released in 2011, ST96 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras