Reasons to choose ES90
Released in 2013, ES90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ES90
vs Samsung ES95
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ES9028 mm²
ES95- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ES90 and ES95 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ES90MetricES95
14.2 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.42 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
49.9 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight90 g
SD/SDHCStoragemicroSD/microSDHC
BP70A (740mA)BatteryBP70A
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ES90 and ES95 have the same sensor area. The ES95 has the lighter body. The ES95 has the higher effective resolution. The ES90 and ES95 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose ES95
Released in 2013, ES95 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.