CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ES80
vs Samsung ST96

Archive illustration for Samsung ES80

Samsung / 2011

ES80

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST96

Samsung / 2011

ST96

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ES80
28 mm²
ST96
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ES80 and ST96 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

ES80MetricST96
12 MPEffective pixels14.6 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area1.95 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density51.3 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ES80 and ST96 have the same sensor area. The ES80 has the lighter body. The ST96 has the higher effective resolution. The ES80 and ST96 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ES80

Released in 2011, ES80 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST96

Released in 2011, ST96 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras