CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ES80
vs Samsung ST1000

Archive illustration for Samsung ES80

Samsung / 2011

ES80

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST1000

Samsung / 2009

ST1000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ES80
28 mm²
ST1000
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ES80 and ST1000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ES80MetricST1000
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ES80 and ST1000 have the same sensor area. The ES80 and ST1000 have the same body weight. The ES80 and ST1000 have the same effective resolution. The ES80 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ES80

Released in 2011, ES80 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST1000

Released in 2009, ST1000 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras