Reasons to choose ES50
Released in 2009, ES50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ES50
vs Samsung WB690
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ES5028 mm²
WB690- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ES50 and WB690 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
ES50MetricWB690
8 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
3.47 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
28.86 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight160 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ES50 and WB690 have the same sensor area. The ES50 has the lighter body. The WB690 has the higher effective resolution. The WB690 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB690
Released in 2011, WB690 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.