CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ES50
vs Samsung PL170

Archive illustration for Samsung ES50

Samsung / 2009

ES50

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung PL170

Samsung / 2011

PL170

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ES50
28 mm²
PL170
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ES50 and PL170 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ES50MetricPL170
8 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.31 µm
3.47 µm²Pixel area1.72 µm²
28.86 MP/cm²Pixel density58.07 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight87 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ES50 and PL170 have the same sensor area. The ES50 has the lighter body. The PL170 has the higher effective resolution. The PL170 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ES50

Released in 2009, ES50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PL170

Released in 2011, PL170 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 87 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras