CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ES30
vs Samsung ST90

Archive illustration for Samsung ES30

Samsung / 2010

ES30

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST90

Samsung / 2011

ST90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ES30
28 mm²
ST90
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ES30 and ST90 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ES30MetricST90
12 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.02 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.54 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight121 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ES30 and ST90 have the same sensor area. The ES30 has the lighter body. The ST90 has the higher effective resolution. The ST90 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ES30

Released in 2010, ES30 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST90

Released in 2011, ST90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras