CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung DV300F
vs Samsung ST76

Archive illustration for Samsung DV300F

Samsung / 2012

DV300F

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST76

Samsung / 2012

ST76

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DV300F
28 mm²
ST76
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DV300F and ST76 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DV300FMetricST76
16 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video—
103 gWeight341 g
microSDStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion BP88 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DV300F and ST76 have the same sensor area. The DV300F has the lighter body. The ST76 has the higher effective resolution. The DV300F and ST76 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DV300F

Released in 2012, DV300F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 103 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST76

Released in 2012, ST76 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 341 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras