CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung DV300F
vs Samsung EX2F

Archive illustration for Samsung DV300F

Samsung / 2012

DV300F

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung EX2F

Samsung / 2012

EX2F

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DV300F
42 mm²
EX2F
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The EX2F has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DV300FMetricEX2F
16 MPEffective pixels12.4 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.85 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area3.42 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density29.2 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.6
1,280 × 720Maximum video—
103 gWeight294 g
microSDStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion BP88 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-10A battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EX2F has the larger sensor area. The DV300F has the lighter body. The DV300F has the higher effective resolution. The DV300F and EX2F were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DV300F

Released in 2012, DV300F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 103 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EX2F

Released in 2012, EX2F has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 294 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras