CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung DV150F
vs Samsung WB800F

Archive illustration for Samsung DV150F

Samsung / 2013

DV150F

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB800F

Samsung / 2013

WB800F

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DV150F
28 mm²
WB800F
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DV150F and WB800F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DV150FMetricWB800F
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.75 µm²
56.92 MP/cm²Pixel density57.27 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video—
116 gWeight218 g
microSD/microSDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
BP70aBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DV150F and WB800F have the same sensor area. The DV150F has the lighter body. The WB800F has the higher effective resolution. The DV150F and WB800F were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DV150F

Released in 2013, DV150F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB800F

Released in 2013, WB800F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 218 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras