CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung Digimax 35 MP3
vs Samsung Digimax 50 duo

Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 35 MP3

Samsung / 2000

Digimax 35 MP3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 50 duo

Samsung / 2001

Digimax 50 duo

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
Digimax 35 MP3
17 mm²
Digimax 50 duo
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Digimax 35 MP3 and Digimax 50 duo have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digimax 35 MP3MetricDigimax 50 duo
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
7.59 µmPixel pitch7.59 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area57.6 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density1.74 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
190 gWeight126 g
CompactFlash type IStorage—
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digimax 35 MP3 and Digimax 50 duo have the same sensor area. The Digimax 50 duo has the lighter body. The Digimax 35 MP3 and Digimax 50 duo have the same effective resolution. The Digimax 50 duo is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digimax 35 MP3

Released in 2000, Digimax 35 MP3 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 50 duo

Released in 2001, Digimax 50 duo has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras