CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung Digimax 330
vs Samsung Digimax 350SE

Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 330

Samsung / 2001

Digimax 330

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 350SE

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 350SE

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
Digimax 330
38 mm²
Digimax 350SE
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The Digimax 330 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digimax 330MetricDigimax 350SE
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.57 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
12.72 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
7.86 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
397 gWeight320 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompact Flash Type I
4x AABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digimax 330 has the larger sensor area. The Digimax 350SE has the lighter body. The Digimax 330 has the higher effective resolution. The Digimax 350SE is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digimax 330

Released in 2001, Digimax 330 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 397 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 350SE

Released in 2002, Digimax 350SE has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras