CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung Digimax 230
vs Samsung Digimax 50 duo

Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 230

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 230

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 50 duo

Samsung / 2001

Digimax 50 duo

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Digimax 230
17 mm²
Digimax 50 duo
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The Digimax 230 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digimax 230MetricDigimax 50 duo
1.9 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.8 × 3.6
3.35 µmPixel pitch7.59 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area57.6 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density1.74 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight126 g
CompactFlash type IStorage—
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digimax 230 has the larger sensor area. The Digimax 50 duo has the lighter body. The Digimax 230 has the higher effective resolution. The Digimax 230 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digimax 230

Released in 2002, Digimax 230 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 50 duo

Released in 2001, Digimax 50 duo has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras