CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung Digimax 101
vs Samsung Digimax 330

Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 101

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 101

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 330

Samsung / 2001

Digimax 330

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Digimax 101
42 mm²
Digimax 330
Area ratio
1.38:1
Absolute difference
12 mm²
Relative difference
38.2%

The Digimax 330 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digimax 101MetricDigimax 330
1.3 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.53 × 5.64
4.86 µmPixel pitch3.57 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area12.72 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density7.86 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight397 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digimax 330 has the larger sensor area. The Digimax 101 has the lighter body. The Digimax 330 has the higher effective resolution. The Digimax 101 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digimax 101

Released in 2002, Digimax 101 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 330

Released in 2001, Digimax 330 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 397 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras