Reasons to choose Digimax 101
Released in 2002, Digimax 101 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung Digimax 101
vs Samsung Digimax 202
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Digimax 10131 mm²
Digimax 202- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Digimax 101 and Digimax 202 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Digimax 101MetricDigimax 202
1.3 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.02 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area16.17 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density6.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight120 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Digimax 101 and Digimax 202 have the same sensor area. The Digimax 202 has the lighter body. The Digimax 202 has the higher effective resolution. The Digimax 202 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digimax 202
Released in 2004, Digimax 202 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.