CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung CL65
vs Samsung TL205

Archive illustration for Samsung CL65

Samsung / 2008

CL65

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung TL205

Samsung / 2010

TL205

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
CL65
28 mm²
TL205
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CL65 and TL205 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CL65MetricTL205
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.51 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.27 µm²Pixel area2.27 µm²
44 MP/cm²Pixel density44 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
176 gWeight177 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Lithium-Ion rechargeable (SLB-10A) Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-07B rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CL65 and TL205 have the same sensor area. The CL65 has the lighter body. The CL65 and TL205 have the same effective resolution. The TL205 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CL65

Released in 2008, CL65 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 176 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL205

Released in 2010, TL205 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 177 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras