CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung CL5
vs Samsung WB750

Archive illustration for Samsung CL5

Samsung / 2009

CL5

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB750

Samsung / 2011

WB750

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
CL5
28 mm²
WB750
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The WB750 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CL5MetricWB750
9 MPEffective pixels12.5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.66 µmPixel pitch1.49 µm
2.76 µm²Pixel area2.22 µm²
36.23 MP/cm²Pixel density45.09 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
141 gWeight194 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion SLB-07A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The WB750 has the larger sensor area. The CL5 has the lighter body. The WB750 has the higher effective resolution. The WB750 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CL5

Released in 2009, CL5 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9 MP effective resolution, and a 141 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB750

Released in 2011, WB750 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.5 MP effective resolution, and a 194 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras