CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung AQ100
vs Samsung WB210

Archive illustration for Samsung AQ100

Samsung / 2010

AQ100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB210

Samsung / 2011

WB210

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
AQ100
28 mm²
WB210
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The WB210 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

AQ100MetricWB210
12.2 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.51 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.27 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
44 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight174 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion NP-45 battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The WB210 has the larger sensor area. The AQ100 has the lighter body. The WB210 has the higher effective resolution. The WB210 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose AQ100

Released in 2010, AQ100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB210

Released in 2011, WB210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras