CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei RCP-S10
vs Rollei Sportsline 90

Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-S10

Rollei / 2008

RCP-S10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Sportsline 90

Rollei / 2009

Sportsline 90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
RCP-S10
28 mm²
Sportsline 90
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The RCP-S10 and Sportsline 90 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

RCP-S10MetricSportsline 90
10 MPEffective pixels9 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.78 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.16 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density31.62 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight119 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The RCP-S10 and Sportsline 90 have the same sensor area. The Sportsline 90 has the lighter body. The RCP-S10 has the higher effective resolution. The Sportsline 90 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose RCP-S10

Released in 2008, RCP-S10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Sportsline 90

Released in 2009, Sportsline 90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9 MP effective resolution, and a 119 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras