CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei RCP-6324
vs Rollei XS-8 Crystal

Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-6324

Rollei / 2008

RCP-6324

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei XS-8 Crystal

Rollei / 2009

XS-8 Crystal

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
RCP-6324
25 mm²
XS-8 Crystal
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The RCP-6324 and XS-8 Crystal have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

RCP-6324MetricXS-8 Crystal
6.16 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.01 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
4.03 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
24.8 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight114 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The RCP-6324 and XS-8 Crystal have the same sensor area. The XS-8 Crystal has the lighter body. The XS-8 Crystal has the higher effective resolution. The XS-8 Crystal is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose RCP-6324

Released in 2008, RCP-6324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.16 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose XS-8 Crystal

Released in 2009, XS-8 Crystal has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras