CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Prego dp8300
vs Rollei RCP-8325X

Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp8300

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp8300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-8325X

Rollei / 2007

RCP-8325X

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Prego dp8300
38 mm²
RCP-8325X
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Prego dp8300 and RCP-8325X have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Prego dp8300MetricRCP-8325X
8.1 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.16 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
4.68 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
21.37 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight—
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Prego dp8300 and RCP-8325X have the same sensor area. The RCP-8325X has the lighter body. The Prego dp8300 has the higher effective resolution. The RCP-8325X is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Prego dp8300

Released in 2005, Prego dp8300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-8325X

Released in 2007, RCP-8325X has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras