CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Prego dp6200
vs Rollei Prego dp8300

Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp6200

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp6200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp8300

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp8300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Prego dp6200
38 mm²
Prego dp8300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Prego dp6200 and Prego dp8300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Prego dp6200MetricPrego dp8300
6.36 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.44 µmPixel pitch2.16 µm
5.96 µm²Pixel area4.68 µm²
16.78 MP/cm²Pixel density21.37 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Prego dp6200 and Prego dp8300 have the same sensor area. The Prego dp6200 has the lighter body. The Prego dp8300 has the higher effective resolution. The Prego dp6200 and Prego dp8300 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Prego dp6200

Released in 2005, Prego dp6200 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp8300

Released in 2005, Prego dp8300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras