CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Prego dp5500
vs Rollei Prego dp6200

Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5500

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp5500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp6200

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp6200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Prego dp5500
38 mm²
Prego dp6200
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The Prego dp6200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Prego dp5500MetricPrego dp6200
5 MPEffective pixels6.36 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.44 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area5.96 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density16.78 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Prego dp6200 has the larger sensor area. The Prego dp5500 and Prego dp6200 have the same body weight. The Prego dp6200 has the higher effective resolution. The Prego dp5500 and Prego dp6200 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5500

Released in 2005, Prego dp5500 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp6200

Released in 2005, Prego dp6200 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras