CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Prego da4
vs Rollei Prego dp5200

Archive illustration for Rollei Prego da4

Rollei / 2004

Prego da4

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5200

Rollei / 2004

Prego dp5200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Prego da4
25 mm²
Prego dp5200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Prego da4 and Prego dp5200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Prego da4MetricPrego dp5200
4.1 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.46 µmPixel pitch2.19 µm
6.06 µm²Pixel area4.78 µm²
16.51 MP/cm²Pixel density20.93 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
167 gWeight130 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Prego da4 and Prego dp5200 have the same sensor area. The Prego dp5200 has the lighter body. The Prego dp5200 has the higher effective resolution. The Prego da4 and Prego dp5200 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Prego da4

Released in 2004, Prego da4 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5200

Released in 2004, Prego dp5200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras