CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Prego da3
vs Rollei Prego da4

Archive illustration for Rollei Prego da3

Rollei / 2004

Prego da3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego da4

Rollei / 2004

Prego da4

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Prego da3
25 mm²
Prego da4
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The Prego da4 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Prego da3MetricPrego da4
3.2 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
167 gWeight167 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Prego da4 has the larger sensor area. The Prego da3 and Prego da4 have the same body weight. The Prego da4 has the higher effective resolution. The Prego da3 and Prego da4 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Prego da3

Released in 2004, Prego da3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego da4

Released in 2004, Prego da4 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras