CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Powerflex 610 HD
vs Rollei Powerflex 800

Archive illustration for Rollei Powerflex 610 HD

Rollei / 2012

Powerflex 610 HD

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Powerflex 800

Rollei / 2012

Powerflex 800

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Powerflex 610 HD
28 mm²
Powerflex 800
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The Powerflex 610 HD has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Powerflex 610 HDMetricPowerflex 800
16 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight182 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Powerflex 610 HD has the larger sensor area. The Powerflex 610 HD has the lighter body. The Powerflex 610 HD has the higher effective resolution. The Powerflex 610 HD and Powerflex 800 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Powerflex 610 HD

Released in 2012, Powerflex 610 HD has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Powerflex 800

Released in 2012, Powerflex 800 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 182 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras