CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Powerflex 440
vs Rollei Powerflex 450

Archive illustration for Rollei Powerflex 440

Rollei / 2010

Powerflex 440

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Powerflex 450

Rollei / 2010

Powerflex 450

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Powerflex 440
28 mm²
Powerflex 450
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Powerflex 440 and Powerflex 450 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Powerflex 440MetricPowerflex 450
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Powerflex 440 and Powerflex 450 have the same sensor area. The Powerflex 450 has the lighter body. The Powerflex 440 and Powerflex 450 have the same effective resolution. The Powerflex 440 and Powerflex 450 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Powerflex 440

Released in 2010, Powerflex 440 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Powerflex 450

Released in 2010, Powerflex 450 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras