CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Powerflex 400
vs Rollei Powerflex 470

Archive illustration for Rollei Powerflex 400

Rollei / 2011

Powerflex 400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Powerflex 470

Rollei / 2011

Powerflex 470

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Powerflex 400
28 mm²
Powerflex 470
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Powerflex 400 and Powerflex 470 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Powerflex 400MetricPowerflex 470
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
104 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Powerflex 400 and Powerflex 470 have the same sensor area. The Powerflex 400 has the lighter body. The Powerflex 400 and Powerflex 470 have the same effective resolution. The Powerflex 400 and Powerflex 470 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Powerflex 400

Released in 2011, Powerflex 400 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 104 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Powerflex 470

Released in 2011, Powerflex 470 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras