CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Kids 100
vs Rollei Sportsline 50

Archive illustration for Rollei Kids 100

Rollei / 2010

Kids 100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Sportsline 50

Rollei / 2010

Sportsline 50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
Kids 100
28 mm²
Sportsline 50
Area ratio
2.04:1
Absolute difference
30 mm²
Relative difference
104.1%

The Kids 100 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Kids 100MetricSportsline 50
0.3 MPEffective pixels5 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor6.16 × 4.62
13.91 µmPixel pitch2.39 µm
193.6 µm²Pixel area5.69 µm²
0.52 MP/cm²Pixel density17.57 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
250 gWeight98 g
—StoragemicroSD
4x AABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Kids 100 has the larger sensor area. The Sportsline 50 has the lighter body. The Sportsline 50 has the higher effective resolution. The Kids 100 and Sportsline 50 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Kids 100

Released in 2010, Kids 100 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Sportsline 50

Released in 2010, Sportsline 50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras