Reasons to choose Flexline 140
Released in 2008, Flexline 140 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Flexline 140
vs Rollei Flexline 200
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Flexline 14028 mm²
Flexline 200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Flexline 140 and Flexline 200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Flexline 140MetricFlexline 200
10 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
126 gWeight126 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Flexline 140 and Flexline 200 have the same sensor area. The Flexline 140 and Flexline 200 have the same body weight. The Flexline 200 has the higher effective resolution. The Flexline 200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Flexline 200
Released in 2009, Flexline 200 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.