Reasons to choose dt 4200
Released in 2003, dt 4200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dt 4200
vs Rollei Prego dp4200
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
dt 420025 mm²
Prego dp4200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The dt 4200 and Prego dp4200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
dt 4200MetricPrego dp4200
4.23 MPEffective pixels4.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.42 µmPixel pitch2.43 µm
5.87 µm²Pixel area5.91 µm²
17.03 MP/cm²Pixel density16.91 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight125 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dt 4200 and Prego dp4200 have the same sensor area. The Prego dp4200 has the lighter body. The dt 4200 has the higher effective resolution. The dt 4200 and Prego dp4200 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego dp4200
Released in 2003, Prego dp4200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.