CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dt 3200
vs Rollei dt 4200

Archive illustration for Rollei dt 3200

Rollei / 2003

dt 3200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dt 4200

Rollei / 2003

dt 4200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
dt 3200
25 mm²
dt 4200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dt 3200 and dt 4200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dt 3200Metricdt 4200
3.25 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.76 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
7.64 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
13.08 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dt 3200 and dt 4200 have the same sensor area. The dt 3200 and dt 4200 have the same body weight. The dt 4200 has the higher effective resolution. The dt 3200 and dt 4200 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dt 3200

Released in 2003, dt 3200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.25 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dt 4200

Released in 2003, dt 4200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras