CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dsx 410
vs Rollei Prego dp5500

Archive illustration for Rollei dsx 410

Rollei / 2005

dsx 410

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5500

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp5500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
dsx 410
25 mm²
Prego dp5500
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dsx 410 and Prego dp5500 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dsx 410MetricPrego dp5500
4 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.49 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight130 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dsx 410 and Prego dp5500 have the same sensor area. The Prego dp5500 has the lighter body. The Prego dp5500 has the higher effective resolution. The dsx 410 and Prego dp5500 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dsx 410

Released in 2005, dsx 410 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5500

Released in 2005, Prego dp5500 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras