CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dr 5
vs Rollei Prego dp5200

Archive illustration for Rollei dr 5

Rollei / 2005

dr 5

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5200

Rollei / 2004

Prego dp5200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
dr 5
25 mm²
Prego dp5200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dr 5 and Prego dp5200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

dr 5MetricPrego dp5200
5 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.19 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.78 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.93 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight130 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AA, Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dr 5 and Prego dp5200 have the same sensor area. The Prego dp5200 has the lighter body. The Prego dp5200 has the higher effective resolution. The dr 5 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dr 5

Released in 2005, dr 5 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5200

Released in 2004, Prego dp5200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras