CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dp6500
vs Rollei Prego dp8300

Archive illustration for Rollei dp6500

Rollei / 2005

dp6500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp8300

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp8300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
dp6500
38 mm²
Prego dp8300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dp6500 and Prego dp8300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dp6500MetricPrego dp8300
6 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.16 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area4.68 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density21.37 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dp6500 and Prego dp8300 have the same sensor area. The dp6500 has the lighter body. The Prego dp8300 has the higher effective resolution. The dp6500 and Prego dp8300 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dp6500

Released in 2005, dp6500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp8300

Released in 2005, Prego dp8300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras