CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dp6500
vs Rollei Prego dp5500

Archive illustration for Rollei dp6500

Rollei / 2005

dp6500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5500

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp5500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
dp6500
25 mm²
Prego dp5500
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The dp6500 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

dp6500MetricPrego dp5500
6 MPEffective pixels5 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dp6500 has the larger sensor area. The dp6500 has the lighter body. The dp6500 has the higher effective resolution. The dp6500 and Prego dp5500 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dp6500

Released in 2005, dp6500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5500

Released in 2005, Prego dp5500 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras