CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dp6500
vs Rollei Prego da6

Archive illustration for Rollei dp6500

Rollei / 2005

dp6500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego da6

Rollei / 2004

Prego da6

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
dp6500
38 mm²
Prego da6
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dp6500 and Prego da6 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

dp6500MetricPrego da6
6 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight170 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dp6500 and Prego da6 have the same sensor area. The dp6500 has the lighter body. The dp6500 and Prego da6 have the same effective resolution. The dp6500 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dp6500

Released in 2005, dp6500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego da6

Released in 2004, Prego da6 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras