CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dk4010
vs Samsung Digimax U-CA 3

Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax U-CA 3

Samsung / 2003

Digimax U-CA 3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dk4010
21 mm²
Digimax U-CA 3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dk4010 and Digimax U-CA 3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

dk4010MetricDigimax U-CA 3
4 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
5.33 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
18.76 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight134 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory stick Duo
4x AABattery3.7V Li-ion or 3V Lithium battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dk4010 and Digimax U-CA 3 have the same sensor area. The Digimax U-CA 3 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax U-CA 3

Released in 2003, Digimax U-CA 3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 134 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras