Reasons to choose dk4010
Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dk4010
vs Rollei Prego dp6000
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dk401038 mm²
Prego dp6000- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 17 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The Prego dp6000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dk4010MetricPrego dp6000
4 MPEffective pixels6.36 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.44 µm
5.33 µm²Pixel area5.96 µm²
18.76 MP/cm²Pixel density16.78 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight180 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Prego dp6000 has the larger sensor area. The Prego dp6000 has the lighter body. The Prego dp6000 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 and Prego dp6000 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego dp6000
Released in 2005, Prego dp6000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.