CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dk4010
vs Rollei dsx 410

Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dsx 410

Rollei / 2005

dsx 410

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dk4010
25 mm²
dsx 410
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The dsx 410 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

dk4010Metricdsx 410
4 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
5.33 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
18.76 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dsx 410 has the larger sensor area. The dsx 410 has the lighter body. The dk4010 and dsx 410 have the same effective resolution. The dk4010 and dsx 410 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dsx 410

Released in 2005, dsx 410 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras