CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dk4010
vs Rollei dp6500

Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dp6500

Rollei / 2005

dp6500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dk4010
38 mm²
dp6500
Area ratio
1.78:1
Absolute difference
17 mm²
Relative difference
77.8%

The dp6500 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

dk4010Metricdp6500
4 MPEffective pixels6 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
5.33 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
18.76 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight120 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dp6500 has the larger sensor area. The dp6500 has the lighter body. The dp6500 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 and dp6500 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dp6500

Released in 2005, dp6500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras