CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dk 3000
vs Rollei dk4010

Archive illustration for Rollei dk 3000

Rollei / 2004

dk 3000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dk 3000
21 mm²
dk4010
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dk 3000 and dk4010 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

dk 3000Metricdk4010
3.14 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.61 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
6.79 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
14.73 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight350 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dk 3000 and dk4010 have the same sensor area. The dk 3000 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dk 3000

Released in 2004, dk 3000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras