CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dc 3100
vs Rollei dp 300

Archive illustration for Rollei dc 3100

Rollei / 2003

dc 3100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dp 300

Rollei / 2003

dp 300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dc 3100
21 mm²
dp 300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dc 3100 and dp 300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dc 3100Metricdp 300
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight190 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dc 3100 and dp 300 have the same sensor area. The dc 3100 has the lighter body. The dc 3100 and dp 300 have the same effective resolution. The dc 3100 and dp 300 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dc 3100

Released in 2003, dc 3100 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dp 300

Released in 2003, dp 300 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras