CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei da5324
vs Rollei dsx 410

Archive illustration for Rollei da5324

Rollei / 2005

da5324

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dsx 410

Rollei / 2005

dsx 410

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
da5324
25 mm²
dsx 410
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The da5324 and dsx 410 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

da5324Metricdsx 410
5.19 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.19 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
4.79 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
20.89 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The da5324 and dsx 410 have the same sensor area. The da5324 has the lighter body. The da5324 has the higher effective resolution. The da5324 and dsx 410 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose da5324

Released in 2005, da5324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.19 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dsx 410

Released in 2005, dsx 410 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras