CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei da10
vs Rollei Prego dp5500

Archive illustration for Rollei da10

Rollei / 2006

da10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5500

Rollei / 2005

Prego dp5500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
da10
25 mm²
Prego dp5500
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The da10 and Prego dp5500 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

da10MetricPrego dp5500
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The da10 and Prego dp5500 have the same sensor area. The da10 has the lighter body. The da10 and Prego dp5500 have the same effective resolution. The da10 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose da10

Released in 2006, da10 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5500

Released in 2005, Prego dp5500 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras