CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei da10
vs Rollei dpx 310

Archive illustration for Rollei da10

Rollei / 2006

da10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dpx 310

Rollei / 2005

dpx 310

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
da10
21 mm²
dpx 310
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The da10 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

da10Metricdpx 310
5 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The da10 has the larger sensor area. The da10 has the lighter body. The da10 has the higher effective resolution. The da10 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose da10

Released in 2006, da10 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dpx 310

Released in 2005, dpx 310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras